1. Incomplete
Meaning and Usage
“Incomplete” refers to something that is not finished, lacking in necessary parts, or not fully developed. When we describe something as “comprehensive,” we mean it covers all aspects, is thorough, and leaves nothing out. “Incomplete,” on the other hand, stands in contrast to this.
For example, consider a research report. A comprehensive research report would include an in - depth analysis of the research topic, covering all relevant literature, data collection from multiple sources, and a detailed discussion of the findings and their implications. In contrast, an incomplete research report might lack important elements. It could have only superficially reviewed the existing literature, missing out on some key studies that are relevant to the topic. The data collection might be limited to a single source, which could lead to biases in the findings. Additionally, the discussion of the findings might be brief and not fully explore the implications of the research, leaving the report as a whole incomplete.
In a different context, think about a project plan. A comprehensive project plan would detail every aspect of the project, from the initial goals and objectives, through the various tasks and milestones that need to be achieved, to the final evaluation and closure of the project. It would also include information about the resources required, such as personnel, budget, and equipment, as well as a risk management plan that identifies potential risks and outlines strategies for mitigating them. An incomplete project plan, however, might not cover all these elements. It could have a vague or poorly defined set of goals and objectives, which makes it difficult to determine what the project is supposed to achieve. The tasks and milestones might not be clearly defined or sequenced, leading to confusion about the order in which things need to be done. The resource management section might be missing or incomplete, not providing accurate information about the personnel, budget, and equipment required for the project. And the risk management plan might be non - existent or only briefly mention a few obvious risks, without fully exploring the potential risks that could impact the project and the strategies for dealing with them.
Contrast with “Comprehensive”
The fundamental contrast between “incomplete” and “comprehensive” lies in the degree of coverage and thoroughness. “Comprehensive” implies a high level of completeness, where all relevant aspects, elements, or details are included and addressed. It suggests a thorough and exhaustive approach, leaving no stone unturned in the pursuit of covering all the necessary ground.
In contrast, “incomplete” indicates a lack of completeness, where some essential parts, aspects, or details are missing or not fully developed. It implies that the work, document, or plan in question has not been carried out to its full extent or has not covered all the relevant areas comprehensively. This lack of completeness can lead to a variety of problems, such as a lack of clarity, an inability to make informed decisions, or a failure to achieve the desired goals or outcomes.
2. Selective
Meaning and Usage
“Selective” means choosing or picking out certain things, items, or aspects while ignoring others. When we use “comprehensive,” we are talking about something that encompasses everything related to a particular subject or situation. “Selective” is the opposite in that it focuses on a subset rather than the whole.
For example, in a museum collection, a comprehensive approach would involve collecting and displaying a wide range of artworks, artifacts, and historical items that cover all periods, styles, and cultures relevant to the museum's theme. This might include ancient sculptures, medieval paintings, modern art installations, as well as historical documents, clothing, and household items. In contrast, a selective museum collection might focus on a specific area. For instance, a museum might choose to have a selective collection of only Renaissance paintings. This means they will deliberately seek out and acquire paintings from that particular period and artistic style, while ignoring artworks from other periods or styles. This selective approach allows the museum to develop a deep and specialized collection in a particular area, rather than having a more general and comprehensive collection that covers a wide range of art and history.
In the context of reading, a comprehensive reader would aim to read and understand a wide variety of materials on a particular subject. For example, if someone is interested in learning about the history of the Industrial Revolution, a comprehensive reader would read books, articles, research papers, and historical documents from different authors, perspectives, and time periods. They would study the economic, social, technological, and political aspects of the Industrial Revolution, as well as its impact on different countries and regions around the world. In contrast, a selective reader might focus on a specific aspect of the Industrial Revolution. For instance, they might be particularly interested in the technological innovations of the Industrial Revolution and choose to read only materials that specifically focus on this aspect. They might read books about the invention of the steam engine, the development of textile machinery, and the advancement of iron and steel production techniques. By being selective in their reading, they can gain a more in - depth understanding of a particular aspect of the Industrial Revolution, but they may miss out on the broader context and the interrelationships between different aspects of the Industrial Revolution.
Contrast with “Comprehensive”
The main difference between “selective” and “comprehensive” is the scope of inclusion. “Comprehensive” emphasizes a broad and all - inclusive scope. It aims to cover every possible aspect, element, or detail related to a particular subject, situation, or task. This approach is often used when a complete and thorough understanding of the subject is required, such as in academic research, comprehensive reports, or in - depth analysis of complex systems.
On the other hand, “selective” focuses on a narrow and specific subset of the available options, aspects, or elements. It involves making deliberate choices to include only certain things while excluding others. This approach is often used when there is a need to concentrate on a particular area of interest, to highlight specific features or characteristics, or to make decisions based on a limited set of criteria. While a selective approach can provide a more in - depth understanding of a particular aspect, it may not give a complete picture of the overall subject or situation, as it deliberately excludes other relevant aspects.
3. Superficial
Meaning and Usage
“Superficial” describes something that is only on the surface, lacks depth, and does not go into the details or complexities of a subject. In contrast, “comprehensive” implies a deep, thorough, and all - encompassing examination of a topic.
For example, consider a news report on a political event. A comprehensive news report would cover all aspects of the event. It would include details about the background of the political issue, interviews with key stakeholders such as politicians, experts, and representatives of the affected groups. The report would analyze the different perspectives on the issue, discuss the potential implications of the event for the country's political, economic, and social landscape, and provide in - depth analysis of the policies and decisions made during the event. In contrast, a superficial news report on the same political event might only provide a brief summary of the event. It might mention the main speakers and the general topic of the event, but it would not go into the details of the political issue, the different perspectives on the issue, or the potential implications of the event. The report might lack in - depth analysis and instead rely on surface - level observations and quotes from the speakers, without fully exploring the underlying issues and complexities of the event.
In the context of a book review, a comprehensive book review would cover all aspects of the book. It would include an analysis of the book's plot, characters, themes, writing style, and structure. The review would discuss how the author has developed the plot and characters, how the themes are explored and interwoven throughout the book, and how the writing style and structure contribute to the overall impact and effectiveness of the book. The review would also provide a comparison of the book with other works in the same genre or by the same author, discuss the book's strengths and weaknesses, and provide recommendations for who might enjoy reading the book. In contrast, a superficial book review might only provide a brief summary of the book's plot and a few general comments about the book. It might mention whether the reviewer liked or disliked the book, but it would not go into the details of the book's plot, characters, themes, writing style, or structure. The review might lack in - depth analysis and instead rely on surface - level observations and personal opinions, without fully exploring the literary merits and complexities of the book.
Contrast with “Comprehensive”
The fundamental difference between “superficial” and “comprehensive” lies in the level of depth and detail of the examination. “Comprehensive” involves a deep, thorough, and all - encompassing exploration of a subject. It aims to leave no stone unturned, to cover every possible aspect, element, or detail related to the subject, and to provide a complete and in - depth understanding of the subject. This approach requires a high level of research, analysis, and attention to detail, and it often results in a comprehensive report, a detailed analysis, or a thorough exploration of a complex topic.
In contrast, “superficial” only scratches the surface of a subject. It lacks depth and does not go into the details or complexities of the subject. A superficial examination might only provide a brief summary, a few general observations, or a surface - level analysis of the subject, without fully exploring the underlying issues, the different perspectives, or the potential implications of the subject. This approach often results in a shallow understanding of the subject, which may be insufficient for making informed decisions, for conducting in - depth research, or for fully appreciating the complexity and significance of the subject.
In conclusion, “incomplete,” “selective,” and “superficial” are all antonyms of “comprehensive.” Each of these words represents a way of approaching a subject that is the opposite of the all - inclusive, thorough, and in - depth nature of “comprehensive.” Whether it's the lack of completeness in “incomplete,” the narrow focus in “selective,” or the lack of depth in “superficial,” these antonyms highlight the importance of comprehensiveness in achieving a full and accurate understanding of a subject.
conducted antonym请用英语来分析，要有可读性
- Neglected
- Meaning and Usage
“Neglected” means to have failed to give proper care, attention, or treatment to something or someone. When an activity is “conducted,” it is carried out in an organized and purposeful manner. “Neglected,” on the other hand, implies a lack of such organized action.
For example, in a scientific research project, if the experiments are “conducted” properly, the researchers will follow a set of procedures, carefully record data, and analyze the results. However, if the project is “neglected,” the researchers may not show up for experiments on time, they might forget to record important data, and they may not analyze the results thoroughly. This lack of proper action can lead to inaccurate or incomplete research findings.
In a business context, if a company “conducts” its marketing campaigns effectively, it will develop a clear strategy, target the right audience, and use a variety of marketing channels such as social media, email, and print advertising. In contrast, if the marketing campaigns are “neglected,” the company may not invest enough time or resources in developing the campaigns. They might use outdated marketing techniques, fail to target the appropriate audience, and not measure the effectiveness of the campaigns. As a result, the marketing campaigns may not generate the desired leads, sales, or brand awareness. - Contrast with “Conducted”
The main contrast between “neglected” and “conducted” lies in the level of attention, organization, and purposefulness. When an activity is “conducted,” there is a clear sense of direction, a plan is in place, and the necessary actions are carried out in an orderly and systematic manner. This often involves setting goals, allocating resources, and monitoring progress to ensure that the desired outcomes are achieved.
In contrast, when something is “neglected,” there is a lack of attention, organization, and purposefulness. The necessary actions are not carried out, or they are carried out in a haphazard and ineffective manner. Goals may not be set, resources may not be allocated properly, and there is no monitoring of progress to ensure that the desired outcomes are achieved. This lack of proper action can lead to negative consequences such as failure to achieve goals, damage to reputation, and loss of opportunities.
- Meaning and Usage
- Abandoned
- Meaning and Usage
“Abandoned” refers to the act of leaving something or someone behind, often with the intention of never returning or resuming the activity. When an activity is “conducted,” it is in progress, being carried out with some level of commitment. “Abandoned” represents the complete opposite, where the activity is stopped and deserted.
For example, consider a construction project. If the project is “conducted” as planned, the construction workers will be on - site every day, following the construction blueprint, using the necessary equipment and materials, and making progress towards completing the building. However, if the project is “abandoned,” the construction workers will suddenly stop working and leave the site. The construction equipment may be left behind, and the building materials may be left to deteriorate. This abandonment can occur due to various reasons such as lack of funds, disputes among the project stakeholders, or unforeseen problems such as natural disasters or technical difficulties.
In an academic context, if a student “conducts” their research for a thesis, they will spend time in the library, conducting experiments in the laboratory, interviewing experts, and analyzing data. They will be committed to completing the research and writing the thesis within the specified time frame. However, if the student “abandons” their research, they will stop working on it altogether. They may not show up for their research sessions, they might not analyze the data they have collected, and they may not even attempt to write the thesis. This abandonment can occur due to reasons such as losing interest in the topic, facing difficulties in conducting the research, or having personal problems that prevent them from focusing on their studies. - Contrast with “Conducted”
The key difference between “abandoned” and “conducted” is the state of progress and commitment. When an activity is “conducted,” it is in a state of active progress. There is a commitment to carrying out the activity, following a plan, and making efforts to achieve the desired goals. Resources are being allocated, actions are being taken, and there is a sense of forward movement towards completion.
In contrast, when an activity is “abandoned,” it is in a state of complete stoppage. The commitment to carrying out the activity has been lost, and there is no intention of resuming the activity in the foreseeable future. Resources are no longer being allocated, actions have ceased, and there is a sense of regression or stagnation. The abandoned activity may be left unfinished, and the goals that were originally intended to be achieved may never be realized.
- Meaning and Usage
- Avoided
- Meaning and Usage
“Avoided” means to have made a conscious decision to stay away from, prevent, or not engage in an activity. When an activity is “conducted,” it implies that the activity is taking place, with the person or group involved actively participating. “Avoided” is the opposite, as it indicates a deliberate effort to not participate in the activity.
For example, in a social situation, if someone “conducts” themselves in a polite and friendly manner at a party, they will greet other guests with a smile, engage in conversations, and show interest in the people around them. However, if the same person “avoids” the party, they will make a conscious decision not to attend. They might come up with excuses such as having other prior commitments, not feeling well, or simply not wanting to be in a social setting with a lot of people. By avoiding the party, they are deliberately choosing not to engage in the social activity and interact with the other guests.
In a business context, if a company “conducts” market research, it will invest time and resources in gathering information about the market, its competitors, and its target customers. The company might use various research methods such as surveys, interviews, focus groups, and data analysis to collect and analyze the information. However, if the company “avoids” market research, it will choose not to invest in this activity. The company might believe that it already has enough information about the market, or it might think that market research is too expensive, time - consuming, or not relevant to its business. By avoiding market research, the company is missing out on valuable information that could help it make better business decisions, develop more effective marketing strategies, and gain a competitive advantage in the market. - Contrast with “Conducted”
The main difference between “avoided” and “conducted” is the presence or absence of active participation. When an activity is “conducted,” the person or group involved is actively engaged in the activity. They are taking actions, making decisions, and expending effort to carry out the activity and achieve the desired goals. There is a sense of purpose and commitment to the activity, and the person or group is actively involved in the process of carrying out the activity.
In contrast, when an activity is “avoided,” the person or group involved is deliberately choosing not to participate in the activity. They are making a conscious decision to stay away from the activity, prevent it from happening, or not engage in the actions and decisions required to carry out the activity. There is a lack of purpose and commitment to the activity, and the person or group is actively avoiding the process of carrying out the activity. This can be due to various reasons such as fear, lack of interest, perceived cost or difficulty, or a belief that the activity is not necessary or relevant.
- Meaning and Usage
In conclusion, “neglected,” “abandoned,” and “avoided” are all antonyms of “conducted.” Each of these words represents a different way in which an activity is not carried out in the organized, purposeful, and committed manner associated with “conducted.” Whether it's the lack of attention and care in “neglected,” the complete stoppage and desertion in “abandoned,” or the deliberate decision not to participate in “avoided,” these antonyms highlight the importance of active and committed engagement in carrying out activities successfully.